Baratza Encore ESP Review (2026): Worth Buying?

Verdict in detail

Buy the Encore ESP if espresso is something you want to explore, not the only coffee you make. Its strongest selling point is keeping that door open without buying two grinders. Our research-based editorial score is 4.2 out of 5, with points lost for noise, basic dosing controls, and fixed-click espresso adjustment.

WIRED’s review supports the broad-use case across espresso and filter methods. CoffeeGeek also treats it as a multipurpose entry-level grinder. That is the right lens: a useful first serious grinder, not a shortcut to a luxury espresso station.

For a broader comparison of grinder choices and practical adjustment advice, read Best AeroPress Grind (2026): 8 Grinders for Better Cups. If you already know espresso is off the menu, you may spend more wisely on a simpler electric grinder or a good hand grinder.

Check Price on Amazon →

Specifications

Performance and everyday workflow

The Encore ESP makes most sense as a flexible home grinder, not a specialist in every brew method. WIRED and CoffeeGeek describe its broad usefulness; Coffee Chronicler is more critical of its compromises. We compared those reviews with manufacturer specifications, focusing on adjustment, brewing fit, controls, cleaning, and the annoyances that matter before breakfast.

Dual-range adjustment: why the ESP matters

Baratza explains that settings 1–20 make smaller changes for espresso, while settings 21–40 cover filter brewing with larger steps. Think of it as two gears on the same dial. You get closer-spaced choices where small grind changes matter most, without endlessly turning a dial to reach brewed coffee.

This is more meaningful than the number 40 on its own. The original Encore also has 40 settings, but they do not use the ESP’s two-range arrangement. A grinder can make very fine grounds yet leave you stuck between a shot that runs too quickly and one that barely drips. Smaller steps help close that gap, though fixed clicks still cannot offer every setting in between.

AeroPress: buy for flexibility, not extra-fine clicks

WIRED includes AeroPress among the methods the ESP suits, and that is the everyday role I would buy it for. You can make your regular cup while keeping espresso available for weekends. The espresso-focused half of the dial is not the main AeroPress benefit; having an accessible range you can return to is more useful.

Start with the grind guidance for your recipe, not a magic click from someone else’s beans. For many recipes, medium-fine grounds look roughly like table salt, but longer steeps can use something coarser. Write down the setting alongside your dose and steep time. A number without the recipe tells you very little, and pressing harder is not a substitute for getting the brew right.

Making AeroPress adjustments without chasing your tail

Change one thing between cups. Keep your beans, coffee amount, water, and steep time fixed while you compare nearby grind settings. Our AeroPress grind guide explains this taste-led approach: if a cup is sharp and thin, try finer; if it is harsh and drying, try coarser. These are starting moves, not diagnoses that fit every bean.

Watch the press as well as the taste. Grounds that are much too fine can make pressing awkward, but a difficult press can also involve the filter or your technique. Stop rather than forcing it. The useful purchase question is whether you want an electric grinder for your daily dose, not whether you can grind your AeroPress coffee as fine as espresso.

Filter coffee: capable, but not the clarity upgrade

Coffee Chronicler’s review discusses filter performance while drawing a distinction between the ESP and more capable brewed-coffee grinders. I would read that as permission to buy the ESP for mixed brewing, not as proof that it is the best route to delicate pour-over flavor.

If your favorite cups taste like fruit tea, with separate notes you can easily pick out, prioritize filter-focused comparisons. Espresso capability may be a feature you never touch. Best Coffee Grinder for Pour Over (2026) helps you choose around that priority. Burr size and material belong in a specification table; they cannot, by themselves, promise a cleaner-tasting cup.

Espresso: a useful entry point with a ceiling

Baratza designed the fine range for espresso, and CoffeeGeek discusses the grinder’s espresso workflow. That gives the ESP a real advantage over buying the original Encore and hoping its settings will be close enough. You can pursue a conventional espresso setup rather than choosing a grinder only for drip coffee and replacing it later.

Coffee Chronicler’s espresso discussion also makes clear that capability is not the same as specialist refinement. If two neighboring clicks miss the shot you want, there is no halfway position. I would not choose the ESP for a routine centered on demanding light roasts or many consecutive shots. That is a recommendation about fit, not a claim that the motor fails after a certain number of drinks.

Controls and dosing: straightforward, not automatic

CoffeeGeek describes the physical controls and dosing workflow, including the cup used to collect grounds for espresso. The standard ESP keeps the operation basic: choose your grind, start the motor, and stop it when your dose is done. There is no need to learn a screen, but there is also no built-in weighing system to handle your coffee amount.

I would keep a scale beside it. Weighing coffee is especially helpful when switching between an AeroPress dose and an espresso basket. Check the output rather than assuming that a timed run always gives the same amount. The dosing cup adds a transfer step, so leave room to set it down and pour comfortably instead of squeezing the grinder into the last free corner.

Switching brew methods and changing beans

The dual-range dial makes this a reasonable one-grinder setup, but you still need separate recipe notes. Record an espresso setting and a filter setting for each coffee you use regularly. When you return to a number, treat it as your first attempt, not a guarantee that the next shot or cup will taste identical.

Retention means coffee left inside the grinder after a dose. Coffee Chronicler discusses workflow drawbacks, but we are not assigning the ESP a universal retained weight. When changing beans, be alert to old grounds mixing into the next dose, and check what lands in the cup. Someone switching coffees for every drink should think harder about single-dose convenience than someone making the same breakfast coffee all week.

Noise and counter space: the everyday compromises

Coffee Chronicler flags noise as a drawback. Take that seriously if your coffee station shares a wall with a bedroom. We have no decibel measurement to offer, and “only runs briefly” is not much comfort when your main goal is avoiding a motor before everyone else wakes up.

Check the listed dimensions against your space, including room above the hopper to add beans and remove parts. The footprint is not the whole fit question. You also need space in front for the grounds cup or bin and room for your scale. A grinder tucked under a low shelf may technically fit while making every refill a small nuisance.

Cleaning and parts: a reason to favor Baratza

The quick-release burr is one of the more practical features here. Baratza lists it, and CoffeeGeek discusses access to removable parts. Being able to reach the burrs matters because cleaning should not feel like dismantling a kitchen appliance every time you change an oily coffee for a lighter one.

Unplug the grinder before opening it, and follow Baratza’s cleaning instructions rather than improvising with water inside the mechanism. Baratza’s support resources and replacement-parts offering strengthen the buying case. They are not a promise of a particular lifespan, free repairs, or permanent availability of every part. Check the current warranty and local support terms before ordering.

Alternatives worth considering

Choose an alternative when your main priority differs from the ESP’s mixed-brewing role. The Fellow Opus 2 offers another all-purpose layout, the TIMEMORE C2 removes the electric motor, and the Fellow Ode Gen 2 leaves espresso behind. Those are different buying decisions, not three automatic upgrades over the Baratza.

Fellow Opus 2: Consider it for single-dose grinding, 48 mm conical burrs, stepless adjustment, and two magnetic catch cups. This is the newer Opus 2, so the original Opus inner-ring adjustment does not apply. Choose between its stepless workflow and the Encore ESP’s numbered steps rather than assuming a cup-quality winner from specifications. For other options, see our burr grinder comparison.

TIMEMORE Chestnut C2: Pick this for travel or a small manual-brewing setup if you are happy to turn the handle yourself. Its listed 25g capacity is useful to check against your daily dose. It trades push-button convenience for portability and no electric motor. Best AeroPress Coffee Grinder (2026): 8 Picks offers a wider set of AeroPress-focused recommendations beyond this review.

Fellow Ode Gen 2: Consider this brewed-coffee-only option when espresso flexibility is not worth paying for. It uses 64mm flat burrs and a single-dose load bin, but it is not for espresso. Coffee Chronicler’s filter-focused comparison is the relevant context here. I would investigate this route for a pour-over-first setup rather than stretching the Encore ESP into a role you do not need.

Frequently asked questions